难道不浪漫

看了这片子，我深深觉得，导演其实是个根本不相信爱情的人。

相不相信爱情，都得油盐酱醋茶。城市就是脏兮兮的，屋子就是灰不拉叽乱糟糟的，就像你我的生活，折腾、闹心又偶尔小小幸福一下下。这世界哪那么多高饱和度的色彩和永远灿烂的阳光。比尔盖茨也烦心啊。

别闹了。相信爱情的，别把现实想象成童话，但现实的爱情也总有它美丽的模样。不相信爱情的，也别把爱情看得那么虚假，现实的世界什么都可能发生。

总而言之，这片子让我感到一种甜蜜、热闹而戏谑的悲伤。不过。用讽刺浪漫的方法拍一部浪漫类型片，真是讽刺到家。导演真是个有趣的人。

这是一部反浪漫喜剧的浪漫喜剧。 有点拗口。就是反转浪漫喜剧的套路。女主其实很漂亮，就是比较胖。说起来，很多白人就算身体胖了，脸也不胖，这样就很占便宜，上镜就是不能是个胖脸，胖脸上镜不好看。 这是反套路一，通常女主要不就是非常漂亮，要不就是有点儿平凡，然后就是霸道总裁爱上我的戏码。

我这些年看过无数的浪漫喜剧，套路也是很熟了。不就是玛丽苏，杰克苏，男主女主人人爱，男二女二争男主女主嘛。当然要有越过重重阻碍，排除万难在一起，在一起啊。

这部电影有意思的地方就是特意的反套路。女主是挺胖的，不是女主身材和脸。女主本来有一个平凡的人生，然后出了意外，醒来以后，发现自己似乎进入了言情电影。本来不太会有交集的霸道总裁看上他了，带她去高档的地方，给她送贵重的礼物，出入豪车。

搞笑的是，在她和霸道总裁马上要亲热的时候，就切换镜头了。她努力的想要把这个切换掉的部分亲身体验一下，往返多次，无法实现，呵呵 PG13 呀。 本片也吐槽那个经典的男女主重逢时必备的慢镜头互相向对方飞奔的场面。

这片子有一段的歌舞部分，相当燃。是个经典老歌 I wanna dance with somebody.

看这片子我笑得东倒西歪。若你想度过轻松的2个小时，推荐给你。

里面很多梗。包括致敬Pretty Woman 这个经典浪漫喜剧。

| Christy Lemire

February 13, 2019 |

“Isn’t It Romantic” tries to have its red velvet cupcake and eat it too, and though it’s tasty and enjoyable while you’re watching it, you’ll realize how hungry you are for something heartier soon after you’ve come down from your sugar high.

It'sas high a high concept as you can imagine: A woman who hates romantic comedies finds herself stuck inside one. You could give the entire elevator pitch in the time it takes to press the button for the floor you want. But the brassy Aussie Rebel Wilson,consistently charmingand game as always for everything that comes her way, finds subtlety and sweetness within this broad premise with her trademark sly, deadpan delivery. She’s raunchy but tender and easy to root for—so much so, that you’ll wish “Isn’t It Romantic” had taken even more chances and allowed her the opportunity to do the same.

The film from director Todd Strauss-Schulson (“A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas”) and screenwriters Erin Cardillo and Dana Fox & Katie Silberman places Wilson at the center of a tricky balancing act. “Isn’t It Romantic” simultaneously ridicules and embraces the many, many clichés of the rom-com genre. It knows these movies are pure formula, and it makes fun of that formula in myriad and amusing ways, including overt references to such predecessors as “Pretty Woman,” “Notting Hill” and “13 Going on 30.” But by the end, it’s also pretty much delivered that exact same formula with sincere enthusiasm, which makes the whole exercise feel like a bit of pointless wheel-spinning.

It’s a tough feat to pull off, regardless of the genre. Edgar Wright managed it beautifully with his Three Flavours Cornetto trilogy of “Shaun of the Dead,” “Hot Fuzz” and “The World’s End.” “Isn’t It Romantic” mostly coasts on Wilson’s likability and the power of recognition: a particularly overused song, some hackneyed character traits, a well-worn narrative device or a tidy way of wrapping things up to achieve a happy ending, etc. But every once in a while, it has something to say about what’s problematic about these familiar film tropes. Why must the heroine always have a flamboyantly gay BFF, and why does he have no life of his own outside of hers? Why must she have a female office rival who hates her for no apparent reason, when they should be working together to topple the patriarchy?

Some food for thought here and there, but “Isn’t It Romantic” mostly serves pleasing, bite-sized nibbles.

Wilson gives it her all, though, as Natalie, a young, single woman living in a dingy New York apartment and working as an architect at a firm where no one appreciates her. That is, except for her work pal Josh (Wilson’s playful “Pitch Perfect” co-star Adam Devine), who clearly has a crush on her while dwelling in the friend zone. One day on the way home from work, she gets mugged on a subway platform, bonks her head and wakes up in the hospital. Suddenly, the world around her has transformed. It’s a wonderland of flattering lighting and flirty doctors. Flowers and cupcakes are everywhere. The bustling NYC streets smell like lavender and the tinkling piano of Vanessa Carlton’s catchy “A Thousand Miles” follows her wherever she goes. Her surly neighbor from across the hall is now a stereotypically wisecracking gay man who loves makeover montages (Brandon Scott Jones, who gets plenty of zingers). And in one of the sharpest insights, Natalie now lives in an impossibly spacious, chic apartment with insane amounts of closet space for her vast shoe collection—the kind of real estate very few people could realistically afford.

Yes, she now lives in the very kind of romantic comedy she’s long despised. (And yes, for those of you keeping score at home, that’s two movies in as many weeks in which our heroine suffers a head injury and wakes up to a different life, between this and “What Men Want.”)

Natalie’s task is to figure out what life lesson she must learn in order to return to her regular life. But she still takes time to enjoy the fantasy, including a whirlwind romance with a wealthy, hunky real estate developer (an earnest and goofy Liam Hemsworth) that includes a candlelight dinner on his yacht and a helicopter trip to the Hamptons. (Their dramatic first kiss in the rain – in the middle of the street where the Empire State Building and the Chrysler Building appear to be only about a block away from each other—is good for a chuckle.) Meanwhile, Josh gets to enjoy his own out-of-this-world love affair with Priyanka Chopra’s impossibly gorgeous and glamorous swimsuit model/yoga ambassador—the kind of passionate relationship that naturally opens Natalie’s eyes to what she’d been missing all along.

Of course, it all concludes with a mad dash to make some last-minute, very public proclamations of love, followed by a second dance number when the first exuberant one alone would have been just fine. By the end, it all feels like overkill, and the movie barely lasts 90 minutes (and couldn’t have sustained its central gimmick much longer). But your face will hurt from smiling so hard—and you may even have a toothache afterward.

此影评的译文可以登录火星译客网站查看，如有翻译不准确之处，望请指出，谢谢！

译员：卖女孩的小火柴。

校对： 驴饭高

这是一部轻喜剧

这是一部对浪漫喜剧轻轻讽刺的浪漫喜剧

笑点和节奏的水准都处于中等偏上吧

不过有两点非常出色

首先是立意

现实与梦幻 平凡与浪漫 自我和外在

女主角原本是个不自信的平凡人 生活在现实中 但是穿越到一个梦幻世界 体验了浪漫 明白了自我 然后回到现实中 变得自信自爱

即便在浪漫的梦幻世界里 缺乏自爱自信 一样没有快乐和成功

纽约还是那么脏 房间还是那么小 但是你的心决定你的世界

另外一点是影片的结构 片尾的设计

片尾应该是影片中的现实世界 但是突如其来的音乐和舞蹈 告诉观众 这还是一部浪漫喜剧 观众需要回到自己的现实当中

我最感到共鸣的是那句 “纽约又脏了 我的公寓又脏了” 女主角用高兴和兴奋的声音说了出来

是啊 那种简约风格的漂亮的家是用来看的 不是用来住的

我也最喜欢自己乱七八糟的狗窝 最常用的东西就摆在手边

女主娜塔莉是个胖女孩，很胖那种，而且是那种职场“便利贴女孩”，不归她份内的事别人都理所应当推给她，明明是建筑师，但存在感像是茶水妹。

她小时候憧憬浪漫爱情喜剧(当时她看的是朱莉娅·罗伯茨的《漂亮女人》)，被母亲泼冷水，长大了后发现的确现实灰暗，转而痛恨浪漫爱情喜剧。

她吐槽了rom-com的N宗罪——

·配有糟糕的流行歌曲

·人们在床上醒来后，头发很整齐，妆容完整

·每次有人穿裤子(指试穿衣服换装)，就变成一组蒙太奇镜头

·总有个女主角超级笨拙，总说“惨了惨了”，但大家都说“她好迷人”

·电影里缺陷让人美丽，现实里缺陷让人丑陋

·在那种电影里，有两个女人在同一个地方上班，她们肯定会是死敌，两个女性同事不能彼此力挺对方，这个想法太恶心了

·在浪漫喜剧的世界里，没有人力资源部，因为没有多元化员工，人们总是互相残杀

·总有个同志闺蜜，他在故事中的唯一目的就是为了帮助性感的女主角，没人关注他的生活是怎样的，太侮辱人了

·总是有愚蠢的旁白，来告诉你该怎么想，知道我怎么想吗？提高演技

·在浪漫喜剧的结尾处，他们总是拍愚蠢的慢动作跑步连续镜头，就好像他们试图破坏婚礼，或是把情人抢回来

·总有个圆满结局，但就此打住不代表这是真的结局，因为接下来发生的一切惨不忍睹

哈哈，得不到的，就要贬为毒饼，这也是人类普遍心态了。

有一天娜塔莉在地铁站遭抢劫，在反抗中撞柱晕厥，醒来后，她就活在浪漫喜剧里了(穿越？平行宇宙？)。

还是那么胖的外型，但人人夸她漂亮迷人，脏乱街区变成高尚社区，蜗居变成宽敞又干净的公寓，华服美鞋满柜，多金帅哥对她一见倾心，还出现了同志闺蜜，甚至还穿插了歌舞场面，而婚礼抢亲场景也是要有的——她吐槽过的桥段，全都体验了一遍。

在这奇幻的旅程里，娜塔莉逐渐接受原本的自己、爱上原本的自己，于是变回原来的生活时，找到自信的她焕然新生，slay职场，并发现真爱原来一直在身边。

在fantasy里，她的男主角是利亚姆·海姆斯沃斯(锤弟)，在reality里，她的男主角是亚当·德维尼。

哈哈，梦还是别醒的好。

冲着女主角看的，很有喜感，扮相着实让人惊艳了一把，一袭红裙，有点小公主的味道。

这种浪漫轻喜剧，每年都有无数在上映，确实也是没什么新鲜故事可以编了，cliche也是在正常不过的事情了。不过，这种片子经久不衰，也是有道理的，霸道总裁爱上我，无非是我们这些贫民窟女孩每天都在做得梦罢了，虽然知道不现实，可依然每天都在幻想。但是，片子最后落脚在了“我爱自己”，感觉转折有些突兀，女主明明已经沉沦在了高富帅的爱情之中，却突然觉醒，很不自然。

还是合格的轻喜剧，很适合吃个饭做个家务的时候看。